[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
RE: Coelacanth article in current NatGeo
I'd almost put money down that basal fleshy lobes on paired fins is the default
setting for the Osteichthyes (ie. bony fish symplesiomorphy) - Guiyu (Silurian
bony fish which is either a stem-sarcopt or a stem-bony fish) has them. The
most primitive actinopterygians (Cheirolepis, Osorioichthys, modern Polypterus)
have well developed basal lobes although with a different internal osteology
than derived lobe-fins. Dunno...perhaps the lobes were necessary for fin
support before the axial elements or lepidotrichia became sufficiently
strengthened or something...
From: owner-DINOSAUR@usc.edu [owner-DINOSAUR@usc.edu] On Behalf Of Erik Boehm
Sent: Thursday, 24 February 2011 8:37 AM
To: email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org
Subject: Re: Coelacanth article in current NatGeo
This reminds me of a question I've had for a while:
What use were lobe-fins before they were adapted into limbs?
Why did the fleshy lobes evolve in the first place?
Please consider the environment before printing this email.
Melbourne Museum – Major Tourist Attraction
Scienceworks – Tourist Attraction
This e-mail is solely for the named addressee and may be confidential. You
should only read, disclose, transmit, copy, distribute, act in reliance on or
commercialise the contents if you are authorised to do so. If you are not the
intended recipient of this e-mail, please notify
mailto:email@example.com by email immediately, or notify the sender
and then destroy any copy of this message. Views expressed in this email are
those of the individual sender, except where specifically stated to be those of
an officer of Museum Victoria. Museum Victoria does not represent, warrant or
guarantee that the integrity of this communication has been maintained nor that
it is free from errors, virus or interference.