[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

RE: Eodromeus preoccupied?



Does it not matter that the dinosaur's name is spelled differently?
Strangely enough, Martinez et al. do refer to another dinosaur by a name that 
is widely known to be preoccupied (Syntarsus, included on the cladogram).  

----------------------------------------
> Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2011 17:40:21 -0700
> From: danchure@easilink.com
> To: rmtakata@gmail.com
> CC: bh480@scn.org; dinosaur@usc.edu
> Subject: Eodromeus preoccupied? WAS Re: Eodromaeus, new basal theropod from 
> Triassic in Argentina
>
> This turned up on a google search. Although it is listed as a nomen nudum the 
> generic name appears in a number of paleoentomoloigcal works.
>
>
> Dan
>
> http://insects.tamu.edu/research/collection/hallan/Arthropoda/Insects/Coleoptera/Family/Trachypachidae.txt
>
> Order Coleoptera
> FAMILY Trachypachidae C. G. Thomson, 1857
> SUBFAMILY Eodromeinae Ponomarenko, 1977
>
>
> GENUS Eodromeus Ponomarenko, 1977b [nomen nudum ?]