[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Expanding the Known Oviraptoverse
Jaime Headden <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> Yes ... but the name is clearly formed as *Ojoraptorsaurus*. No conjoining
> vowel. While the intention may have been to "modify" "Oviraptorosauria," the
> effective function was to combine Ojo + raptor +
> saurus: Ojo [Alamo Formation] plunderer lizard. I would have prefered
> "Placenameasaurus" in this case, or at least gone with a trend and tried
> "Ojoraptor." A jolly little thief, rather.
For some reason, in defiance of ancient Greek practice, conjoining
vowels are apparently optional (_Sinraptor_, _Gigantspinosaurus_,
_Ojoraptorsaurus_, etc). Homer would be horrified. (The poet, not
Lest this post be nothing more than a bitch about nomenclature, I
hasten to add that I can understand why Jaime has such an obsession
with oviraptorosaurs. They really were/are fascinating animals.
Although these two fossils don't add a great deal to the
Oviraptoverse, this is a group that is extremely diverse, and includes
a range of taxa from tiny _Caenagnathasia_ to the massive
_Gigantoraptor_. I only wish we had more than just jawbones for
_Caenagnathasia_ (and since these appear to have been lost, we don't
even have these anymore). I'd really like to know if this little
maniraptoran shows any scansorial/arboreal adaptations similar to
_Microraptor_ or _Epidendrosaurus_.