[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: Greg Paul is right (again); or "Archie's not a birdy"



On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 2:34 PM, Mike Keesey <keesey@gmail.com> wrote:
>Yet another reason why the definition of "Aves" should not rest on
> _Archaeopteryx_.


I think it doesn't matter that much. Tree *topology* is more important
than names. We could restrict Aves as crown-group or include
Dromeosaurinae: the phylogenetical relationships will be the same.

[]s,

Roberto Takata

On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 11:45 PM, Tim Williams <tijawi@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Can you re-send?
>
>
> :-)
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 12:44 PM, Roberto Takata <rmtakata@gmail.com> wrote:
> > * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
> > *         ---REMAINDER OF MESSAGE TRUNCATED---            *
> > *     This post contains a forbidden message format       *
> > *  (such as an attached file, a v-card, HTML formatting)  *
> > *    This Mail List at USC.EDU only accepts PLAIN TEXT    *
> > * If your postings display this message your mail program *
> > * is not set to send PLAIN TEXT ONLY and needs adjusting  *
> > * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
> >