[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Daohugou Beds (was RE: Greg Paul is right (again); or "Archie's not a birdy")
Actually, the age of the Daohugou Beds remain in play, and still may yet turn
out to be Middle Jurassic (or at least at the MJ/LJ
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-DINOSAUR@usc.edu [mailto:owner-DINOSAUR@usc.edu]
> On Behalf Of Jaime Headden
> Sent: Friday, July 29, 2011 1:44 AM
> To: Greg Paul; Dinosaur Mailing List
> Subject: RE: Greg Paul is right (again); or "Archie's not a birdy"
> "It turns out"? My understanding, apart from the potential
> of certain fossils from the Jurassic of the Morrison and
> southern China, is that the Daohugou fauna continues to be
> considered Late Jurassic, and likely Kimmeridgian.
> > In a message dated 7/28/11 6:33:35 PM,
> firstname.lastname@example.org writes:
> > << And no abbreviated tails until the Cretaceous
> > > unless new LJ fossils show otherwise.
> > What about *Epidexipteryx*? >>
> > It looks like Epi is turning out to be as earlier suspected E Cret.
> > </HTML>
Thomas R. Holtz, Jr.
Email: email@example.com Phone: 301-405-4084
Office: Centreville 1216
Senior Lecturer, Vertebrate Paleontology
Dept. of Geology, University of Maryland
Faculty Director, Science & Global Change Program, College Park Scholars
Mailing Address: Thomas R. Holtz, Jr.
Department of Geology
Building 237, Room 1117
University of Maryland
College Park, MD 20742 USA