[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Scypionyx (Ciro) huge monography published
>> Part I deals with osteology and phylogeny. Each bone is detailed, and
>> juvenile characters evaluated, then the classification and phylogenetic
>> relationships are proposed (360 >characters for 95 taxa),
>> according to the authors Scipionyx is a compsognathid, the the sister taxon
>> of Orkoraptor.
This caught me by surprise. Novas et al. (2008) found _Orkoraptor_ to
be a compsognathid (Fig. 8B - consensus majority rule; but not in the
strict consensus tree), although in the accompanying text the authors
were cool on the idea of _Orkoraptor_ being a compsognathid. Later,
Benson et al. (2010) recovered _Orkoraptor_ as a neovenatorid. They
also noted that the postorbital of _Orkoraptor_ is almost identical to
that of _Aerosteon_.
If _Orkoraptor_ is a compsognathid, it's significant for two reasons.
Firstly, it would be the largest known compsognathid by far. I've
seen body length estimates of 6-7m for _Orkoraptor_ - this is more
than double the size of _Sinocalliopteryx_ (~2.4m), otherwise regarded
as the largest compsognathid. If _Orkoraptor_ had compsognathid-like
proportions (including a long tail), it may have had an even longer
body length (7.5-8m).
Secondly, _Orkoraptor_ is from the Pari Aike Formation, which has been
dated to the Maastrichtian. If _Orkoraptor_ is a compsognathid, it
would make it the last known member of this group. (In a similar
vein, Benson et al.  regarded _Orkoraptor_ as the last known
allosauroid.) Either way, and based on what little is so far known of
this theropod, _Orkoraptor_ appears to be a relict taxon.