[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

RE: GSP statement on use of my dinosaur restorations (follow up)

I had written:

<I would like to know why *Kryzanowskisaurus* (*Kryzanowskisaurus hunti* 
{Heckert, 2002}) is in scare quotes>

  And of course I left out a necessary and missing extraneous "z." This should 

  "I would like to know why *Krzyzanowskisaurus* (*Krzyzanowskisaurus hunti* 
{Heckert, 2002}) is in scare quotes"



Jaime A. Headden
The Bite Stuff (site v2)

"Innocent, unbiased observation is a myth." --- P.B. Medawar (1969)

"Ever since man first left his cave and met a stranger with a
different language and a new way of looking at things, the human race
has had a dream: to kill him, so we don't have to learn his language or
his new way of looking at things." --- Zapp Brannigan (Beast With a Billion 

> Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2011 11:26:06 +0100
> From: david.marjanovic@gmx.at
> To: dinosaur@usc.edu
> Subject: Re: GSP statement on use of my dinosaur restorations (follow up)
> > On the one hand, I think Paul is absolutely right to want to get paid
> > for his work. I remember seeing a supposed skeletal reconstruction
> > of Krzyzanowskisaurus that was just Paul's Lesothosaurus, and it was
> > even copyrighted to the paper's author!
> Yeah. Frankly, I think this case should be considered part of Aëtogate.
> I wonder how it got through... peer... oh. NMMNHS Bulletin.
> > On the other hand, I think Paul goes too far in his
> > expectations/demands. In particular, this applies to his apparent
> > desire to exclusively use the "classic left foot pushing off in a
> > high velocity posture" which he popularized in PDW and other works.
> This strikes me as a case like Sony wanting to copyright the term
> "walkman" which had originally been a brand name but has long been used
> for any such device regardless of who produced it. Sony lost; the
> verdict said they should have foreseen this and come up with a term for
> this kind of apparatus before "walkman" spread.
> > Yet there are aspects to Paul's reconstruction style which I don't
> > like. He [...] adds cartilaginous sterna and such
> Not just sterna. You know the intersternum of *Iguanodon*, that
> irregularly shaped small bone that sometimes appeared in the
> diamond-shaped hole between the sterna and the coracoids (and indicates
> that these five bones lay in a continuous cartilaginous plate)? That's
> what he extrapolates to all dinosaurs, as a huge triangular cartilage
> plate -- after ripping their coracoids apart and hanging the furcula in
> the empty space between them. This increases his estimates of trunk
> volume and thus of mass; makes quite a difference for *Tyrannosaurus*
> for instance.