[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: Actually Doing Something About the Great Paleoart Ripoff

Actually, my book, published in 1996 did improve things for a while. I don't think Greg remembers but people weren't charging AT ALL. They were being duped by TV producers into swapping artwork for screen credit only. The main part of the book is up and available on the w&k website www.dinoart.com under "publications". The pricing guidelines are not current and therefore not listed. I would be happy to work with other paleoartists on a site, but I have to draw and paint too, so here is the extent of what I can contribute: The original part of my book with any updates required to make it current, especially as concerns internet use. The suggestion that, unless a contributing paleoartist is adept at HTML, that such a site is produced and supported by WIX.com (They have handsome templates easily modified and inexpensive domain hosting) The information that www.paleoartists.com, .org, .net are available , the ability to register that site and 5 mailboxes associated with it on behalf of the group if asked. I also have the world's largest, (possibly only) database of values of paleoart originals, which because of the terms of my appraisal license I may not post but would make available to any paleoartist requesting sales information.

I am a little wary. Goodnatured generosity to my fellow artists and willingness to work to support the field have, in the past, gained me vitriol from some fellow artists as a "power-grabber" so I want to have others contributing in a major way as well.

On Mar 11, 2011, at 10:33 AM, GSP1954@aol.com wrote:

Having groused about the paleoart problem from a personal perspective it is time to move on to how the community can do things to improve the overall
situation. Perhaps dramatically.

And it is not just the paleo community. The discussion has spread to other
freelance science illustrators who work in exhibits etc.

One item coming in from some non list feedback is that it is apparently becoming an increasing problem is that more and more (but not all) institutions
are becoming more ruthless in pitching artists against one another in
bidding wars. Some – including large scale exhibits producers – are being driven out of business by this sort of thing, as well as chronic demands to lower
prices until the work is no longer profitable. This reflects a general
American management trend to practice libertarian social Darwinism towards the people who actually have talent in order to maximize their product at minimal
cost. The question is what to do about it.

Some sort of formal union may not be workable, but some form of
in-their-faces publicity and organization is required.

A while back Tess K did the nice booklet on pricing and ethical practices that unfortunately was not as effective as hoped (this can be posted as a pdf BTW with an historical explanation of its nature in order to give an idea of what can be done). In hindsight the problem was that only those who got it in hand saw it – i. e. it was too individual to have impact, in particular most management people didn’t see it (and probably none currently working knows about it) -- plus it being a print version meant it became outdated and
so forth.

The best thing to do is set up a website on the issue. Maybe it can be
paleoartistry alone, or be joined with those who do science illustrations in
general, or they can be done in parallel. That can be worked out.

Among the items the site would include would be a politely but firmly
worded statement of the ethics and practices expected and required by artists of all project managers who hire their work. These would state that it is the ethical responsibility of anyone managing an institution or project to be careful to ensure that the compensation they provide is sufficient to support
the artist in a proper lifestyle including health care, retirement, SS
payments, yadda yadda. There can be an explanation of why this is fair and necessary in case any of them are dolts which many but by no means all are. Emphasize the unusual research and reconstruction expertise, effort and time required by paleoartists. Managers must therefore design and budget their projects so that they are not overly ambitious that the creative talent will have to drop their pricing to the point they are working for substandard wages that make it impossible for them to earn a decent if not lucrative lifestyle. Competitive bidding – especially below the minimums noted below – are a
no-no. I am working on a preliminary draft and will soon post it.

Another item on the website will then provide an extensive listing of
minimal pricing for various projects. These minimal prices would be set to provide the full compensation deserved and required by skilled talent. Generous but not outrageous. Anyone would be free to ask for more. As time goes on the minimums can be gradually upped both for inflation, and perhaps to raise the bar a little. Tess might be a person to put together an initial version, which can be sent to a set of people who can suggest adjustments until the
final version is arrived at.

Here’s how this works. Say you the artist is contacted by someone doing a project who asks for an estimate or a bid. Tell them, hey, no problem. You set my fees relative to the those posted on the website. Plus, you only work with those who follow the posted ethical practices. You see, this way you don’t have to make it personal which is always awkward and is usually left unsaid, now it’s just the industry standard posted right there on the web for all to read. If asked for a competitive bid by all means decline. If they start whining and begging poverty and noting that certainly you would understand their problem simply point out to them that you of course cannot undercut the standard rates, and if they cannot raise their payments then they need to
scale back their project as per the statement.

For example, say doing 10 dinosaur restorations for a science center
exhibit or a cable documentary is worth 10 monetary units on the list, so that is what you ask for. This way you do not have to feel awkward by requesting a good solid reward for your efforts that will help you take that well deserved vacation and put the tykes through college. Say the project manager says gosh golly, we have only 5 monetary units budgeted, and it is just ever so hard for science centers to raise money in these tough times, or that the profit margin for their documentary won’t allow them to pay more than 5 monetary units. Couldn’t you help us out this time around? Note that by merely making this request they have gone nonprofessional by pressuring you to accept payment below standard professional levels. In turn, for you to accept payments that do not meet professional needs would be unprofessional on your part. So reply that gosh golly you are just so sorry (not), if you all you have is just 5 monetary units then you get 5 dinosaur restorations in return. After
all, that is the minimum industry standard, now isn’t it? You the
professional artist are not asking for anything out of the ordinary. Feel free to restress how you have to pay for your own health care, entire SS etc if you like. In other words, it ain’t your problem that they don’t have enough money to pay would you should get, it’s entirely their’s. There is a fair chance they will cough up the funds. Or they will scale pay and you will get what you should for the work you do, freeing you to go for those hikes instead of staying in doors on nice days to get under paid for a lot of work, or do
another job. If they do not hire you you will not be exploited.

What if a manager approaches someone new to the bizz and says that since they lack a body of work they should undercut those that do have one. He or she needs to say it makes no difference, the minimum rates apply. This will
benefit everyone.

This scheme will work best if every sticks to their guns. Hopefully over time the management folks will be tamed and disciplined into the compliant
employers they should be.

A potential problem is that the minimum fees could also turn into maximums, making it hard to go higher. At this point the situation is so bad that it may not be relevant. In any case one does not have to utilize the list, and can go ahead and ask for more and see what happens. It may work on occasion.

Here’s another great idea. When the website is ready send a friendly notice to every single museum, science center, science magazine, and documentary company in the US, Canada, Australia and England cheerfully telling them about it, and how we are sure that all will understand and cooperate. Include with that the statement on expected project manager standards. That way they will all have a heads up on the new situation. Some may well realize for the first time the problem, alert others in their institutions as to the new thinking about the situation, and make sincere efforts to accommodate the requirements in future projects. Some sympathetic managers – they are not all evil – will be relieved to have something they can wave in front of their higher ups. Maybe next time when we artists are contacted a project manager will on occasion actually up front offer to meet the requirements alleviating those pesky negotiations in the dark. Others might be shamed into complying. Shame is always good. Then, send out the notice every few years as a “friendly
reminder,” especially for new managers as they turn over.

But wait, there’s more! An additional possibility would be for artists, when they receive fair or better payment, to send the info in to the site where it can be posted. This would help set further precedent and guidance about

Now here is an idea I came up while writing this that even I admit is cool. Have a location where artists can complain about mistreatment by project managers. The complaints could only be formal, just the facts statements of fact with any basic charges of any unethical behavior if they occurred, no over the top rants and accusations. The potential beauty of this is that hopefully it will not need to be used. Mere publicized existence of the site should have a tame and shame impact on employers. And if there is reason to think that someone is chronically underbidding they and those hiring them can be
pointed out. Again, just a statement of what is known.

To top it all off, when the site is up and running send out a press release to science journalists that lets the world know we are not going to take it anymore. Contact the journalists personally to make sure they don’t let it slip by. Might get into the science sections of the NYT, Wash Post, Wall St. J. Really put the museums, documentary producers and their practices in the
spotlight at long last.

The reason paleo and other science artists have been getting screwed is because until now dealing with the people who have the money has been a private
affair in which everyone working in the dark has been at a severe
disadvantage. The web is a mixed bag, but we should be exploiting its potential to force the money people to operate out in the open where they cannot get away with it. Keeping it private leaves them in control, shining light on the
situation can but us in the drivers seat.

As the site is outlined above a nice thing is that if it works it does not require a formal union. If it does not work that can be reconsidered down
the line.

On the site there can also be other items, such as ethical principles for paleoartists. Advice sections. Etc. It can start simple and expand with time.
Anyone can contribute articles.

Now, before people who have not necessarily thought this through yet
(especially nonartists who one wonders why they are intervening in the first place) hit the keyboards to nay say his, please do us all a favor. Criticize what I actually say, not what you think I said because you did not read this carefully enough. Then make sure any criticisms are really well founded – solidly thought out views can be valuable. And criticizing is easy. What is really useful rather than just complaining is proposing useful solutions. So if
you do not have a viable alternative perhaps it is best to not just be
critical. And please understand that the current situation is really bad, something needs to be done. I was about to say the situation cannot get worse, but
it will get worse unless we get organized at some level.

On related topics, the idea of a collective web based paleoart bazaar is a good idea. Anyone could use it, anyone who does would be free to do their own sales via any alternative means they desire. And a tiny part of the
revenues could be used to run the above website.

By the way, it is no longer necessary to print up a bunch of prints, store them, and hope they sell (no way I am going to have a bunch of prints around and pack them up for shipping). They can be printed and shipped to order
via web services.

While writing this up it occurred to me that that when you think about it these things should have been done awhile back. And late is better than never
(unless pulling a rip cord of course).

G Paul</HTML>