[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: Aussiedraco, new Australian pteranodontoid pterosaur

"We can add this to the 'awful names' list"

Yup. Easy to spell, though, which is a boon in these modern times of 

Also, I note that the specimen is only compared to ornithocheiroids despite it 
having a morphology that isn't a million miles away from some ctenochasmatoids 
(e.g. isodont dentition, dorsoventrally tapering and rounded jaw termination, 
rounded ventral apex). The little-mentioned possible ctenochasmatoid 
Huanhepterus even has a convex dorsal surface at it's mandibular tip in the 
region seen in Aussiedraco, though the posterior region of the Aussiedraco 
holotype looks to badly damaged in this region (the description doesn't mention 
this, but the fifth alveoli look pretty badly worn, the midline groove 
disappears and both lateral margins are quite chewed up here: with this in 
mind, I wonder if the dorsal mandibular surface is as convex as it first 
appears). These are only first impressions, mind: a more thorough read of the 
paper and comparisons may well turn up other ideas.



Dr. Mark Witton

Palaeobiology Research Group
School of Earth and Environmental Sciences
University of Portsmouth
Burnaby Building
Burnaby Road

Tel: (44)2392 842418
E-mail: Mark.Witton@port.ac.uk

If pterosaurs are your thing, be sure to check out:

- Pterosaur.Net: www.pterosaur.net
- The Pterosaur.Net blog: http://pterosaur-net.blogspot.com/
- My pterosaur artwork: www.flickr.com/photos/markwitton 

>>> Dann Pigdon <dannj@alphalink.com.au> 20/03/2011 21:32 >>>
On Sun, Mar 20th, 2011 at 6:03 PM, "bh480@scn.org" <bh480@scn.org> wrote:

> Kellner, Alexander W.A.; Rodiriques, Taissa  and  Costa, Fabiana R. 2011
> Short note on a Pteranodontoid pterosaur (Pterodactyloidea) from western
> Queensland, Australia. 
> Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências 83 (1): 301-308.
> ISSN 0001-3765
> http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S0001-37652011000100 
> 018&lng=en&nrm=iso&tlng=en
> Flying reptiles from Australia are very rare, represented mostly by
> isolated bones coming from the Early Cretaceous (Albian) Toolebuc
> Formation, which crops out in western Queensland. Among the first pterosaur
> specimens discovered from this deposit is a mandibular symphysis that some
> authors thought to have a particular affinity to species found in the
> Cambridge Greensand (Cenomanian) of England. It was further referred as a
> member of or closely related to one of the genera Ornithocheirus,
> Lonchodectes or Anhanguera. Here we redescribe this specimen, showing that
> it cannot be referred to the aforementioned genera, but represents a new
> species of Pteranodontoid (sensu Kellner 2003), here named Aussiedraco
> molnari gen. et sp. nov. It is the second named pterosaur from Australia
> and confirms that the Toolebuc deposits are so far the most important for
> our understanding of the flying reptile fauna of this country.

We can add this to the 'awful names' list. Even 'Ozdraco' would have been less 
annoying. What was 
wrong with a more traditional name like 'Australodraco' or 'Australopteryx'? I 
especially like the 
way the latter rolls off the tongue.


Dann Pigdon
Spatial Data Analyst               Australian Dinosaurs
Melbourne, Australia               http://home.alphalink.com.au/~dannj