[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Confuciusornis feather length and flight mode
> How does the Nudds and Dyke 2010
> paper on rachis diameters "ultimately" derive from the
> Senter paper on humeral mobility?
I was referring to the general idea that _Confuciusornis_ was not (fully)
capable of self-powered flight, and specifically the following sentence:
> >> This
> conclusion seems
> >> to be based on
> >> the conclusions of their earlier paper (and
> several other
> >> papers).
Senter's paper is one of the "several others", as you can see in Nudds et al.