[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Zhuchengtyrannus, new Chinese tyrannosaurine
> It hasn't. I think they just meant that the Kem Kem has
> abelisaurids AND *Sigilmassasaurus* AND the two other big
You could be right. Here is the exact wording:
> Upper Cretaceous Moroccan red beds in North Africa have yielded a
> large abelisaurid, _Sigilmassasaurus brevicollis_, together with the
> tetanurans _Carcharodontosaurus saharicus_ and _Spinosaurus
> aegyptiacus_ (Weishampel et al., 2004).
This says flat-out that *S.* is "a large abelisaurid".
The only way to make this ambiguous would have been to lengthen the
list: "have yielded a large abelisaurid, *S. b.*, and something else,
together with the..." -- and even this would make me lean towards the
interpretation that they consider *S.* an abelisaurid.