[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Oviraptorosaurs as prehistoric "peacocks"
Thomas R. Holtz, Jr. <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> And is associated in the living forms (at least) with the development of
> the retricial bulb, which may have been absent outside euornithines.
Yes, tail-fanning in modern birds is controlled solely by the
rectricial bulbs (bulbi rectricium). This is a complex structure
composed of fatty and muscular tissue that encases the pygostyle, and
holds and moves the rectrices. Basal euornitheans/ornithuromorphs
such as _Hongshanornis_ and _Yixianornis_ preserve evidence of a
tail-fan, in the shape and arrangement of the rectrices. These birds,
along with crown birds, also have a very short pygostyle. It is
assumed that the presence of a tail-fan is correlated with the
development of rectricial bulbs, and is an innovation unique to
By contrast, the pygostyles of confuciusornithids, enantiornitheans
and oviraptorosaurs tend to be long and blade-like or rod-like.
_Similicaudipteryx_ had at least a dozen pairs of pennaceous rectrices
along the tail, whereas confuciusornithids and enantiornitheans had
(at most) one or two pairs of streamer-like rectrices associated with
the pygostyle. I like the hypothesis (Gatesy, 2001) that
coossification of the distal caudal skeleton into a pygostyle was
originally associated with tail reduction, and was only co-opted much
later for an aerodynamic function (when rectricial bulbs and
tail-fanning were invented).