[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

RE: Black Feather Colour in Archaeopteryx

  In principle, Paul favored a countershaded coloration befitting sea-going 
birds, such as gulls, rather than terrestrial or inland predators. If Archie is 
more terrestrial than sea-going, it may less likely be countershaded than 
fully-covered in black feathers on the body. Similarly, this is one remigial 
feather, whose sides may be differentially colored, but it may imply a black 
under-coloring (for the wing tips at least) which offer no constructive 
refutation or testing of total plumage coloration, as many gulls _also_ have 
black-tipped wings.


  Jaime A. Headden
  The Bite Stuff (site v2)

"Innocent, unbiased observation is a myth." --- P.B. Medawar (1969)

"Ever since man first left his cave and met a stranger with a
different language and a new way of looking at things, the human race
has had a dream: to kill him, so we don't have to learn his language or
his new way of looking at things." --- Zapp Brannigan (Beast With a Billion 

> Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 07:58:29 -0800
> From: keesey@gmail.com
> To: dinosaur@usc.edu
> Subject: Re: Black Feather Colour in Archaeopteryx
> On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 5:22 AM, <GSP1954@aol.com> wrote:
> > I was cautioned by someone at SVP that the conclusions concerning the color
> > of this feather may not be correct. So I will wait to alter my Arch
> > restorations.
> A lot of yours have seagull-like colors, though--seems like any change
> would be minimal if any were required at all.
> In fact, your illustrations inspired me to use a seagull-like color
> scheme in one of mine:
> http://www.flickr.com/photos/keesey/1095769990/in/set-72157600607422987
> (Which, happily, I do not have to change.)
> --
> T. Michael Keesey
> http://tmkeesey.net/