[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Nopcsaspondylus has no hypophene, please
> On 23 November 2011 23:13, Sebastian Apesteguia
> What I wanted to say with the Rebbachisauroidea is to include in a
> clade more inclusive than Diplodocoidea to those sauropods more
> related to rebbachisaurus than to Diplodocus but outside of
> Rebbachisauridae (which is diagnosed, among other traits) by the
> absence of hyp-hyp articulations.
Well, I can't help how Rebbachisauridae might be DIAGNOSED. But I
know that it's DEFINED as everything more closely related to
Rebbachisaurus than to Diplodocus -- so "those sauropods more related
to rebbachisaurus than to Diplodocus but outside of Rebbachisauridae"
is a fallacy.
Do you maybe want to coin a new name for the more restricted clade
WITHIN Rebbachisauridae that is diagnosed by absence of
hyposphene-hypantrum articulations? Rebbachisaurinae would be an
obvious choice, but I wouldn't want to take a guess at what specified
taxa would be appropriate.
> Anyway, the name was redundant since there were branch-based
> deffinitions around.
> Dr. Sebastián Apesteguía
> Fundación de Historia Natural 'Félix de Azara' -
> CEBBAD (CONICET) - Universidad Maimónides. Virasoro 732,
> Buenos Aires, ARGENTINA
> Tel-fax: 5411-49051100 ext. 1228,
> firstname.lastname@example.org, www.fundacionazara.org.ar