[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]


The chatter in the recent “11th Specimen of Archaeopteryx” discussions
concerning capabilities and traits (or lack thereof) for climbing (NOT
“perching”) in theropods/basal birds reminded me that there is still
an 800-lb gorilla in the room wearing a pink t-shirt that is one size
too small with "Catch-22" scrawled across it in Air Force Blue...
There’s an obvious question that still hasn't received good,
convincing, direct answers...

Were theropods/basal birds up in the trees BEFORE they possessed the
MODERN traits we currently use to define a bird as being arboreal?

If the answer is yes; what were those traits that allowed them to
climb into the trees?

If the answer is no; WHY did selection favor characteristics for an
arboreal lifestyle when theropods/basal birds were cursorial?

Whales, before getting wet, didn't just decide to lose their hind
limbs, sprout flukes, and head for the sea, right?


PS: Bit of trivia for you literary types/WWII buffs... Anyone catch
the reason for the "Air Force Blue" reference? ;-)