[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Nopcsaspondylus has no hypophene, please
Fair cop. I understand that there is typological baggage here. By
"minor clade" I meant a clade that includes a small number of genera -
such as Elasmaria, which was proposed for only two genera
(_Macrogryphosaurus_ + _Talenkauen_). This was the kind of clade that
could have been denoted by a family-level taxon (Macrogryphosauridae
or Talenkauenidae). Instead, the authors opted for a clade that has
no Linnaean entanglements in terms of rank (Elasmaria).
As I see it, the solution is to divest the ICZN of the power to rule
over family-level taxa.
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 10:27 AM, David Marjanovic
> Rescued from truncation:
>> The alternative is just making a name de novo every time you want to
>> name a minor clade=2C and that tends to lead to bizarre names like
>> Laurasiformes as a clade of macronarians. I'm not crazy about that.
>> -- Mike.
> There's no such thing as a "minor" clade. This is the sort of typological t=
> hinking that Ranks provided us=2C that the ICZN enforced with its "only Fam=
> ilies=2C Genera and Species matter" attitude=2C and continues to stand in t=
> he way of people willing to break the constraints of the old system. We are=
> told "it works=2C" but it doesn't=3B it's a crutch for the sake of somethi=
> ng that feels familiar and functional (nesting nomenclature)=2C but it is o=
> therwise useless aside from the feeling of having your names chosen for you=
> . It means less memorization=2C but it means sticking with a system and a t=
> ypological thinking that is fundamentally flawed. As long as the system is =
> used=2C and continues to be used=2C it will impair the breaking of the "Ran=
> ks-are-useful" mind-set that pervades systematic biology and [to a lesser e=
> xtent] paleontology.
> Jaime A. Headden
> The Bite Stuff (site v2)