[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Dinosauria: Original Definition VS Clade Conversion (WAS: Re: tiny-armed theropods)
On Sat, October 22, 2011 5:17 am, Mike Taylor wrote:
> The best place for answering such questions is TaxonSearch at
> It's not taken very seriously because *every* *single* phylogenetic
> definition is replaced by a new one of Sereno 2005, but if you ignore
> the Active Definition parts of the pages, the Definitional History
> sections are very good. In this case,
> shows that Olshevsky (2000:3) suggested a definition of (Megalosaurus
> + Iguanodon).
Ahem... In Padian and Currie (1998), the Padian chapter on DInosauria and
its definition cites a certain T. Holtz as suggesting (pers. comm.) the
use of Meg. & Ig. So its use in peer reviewed literature predates the
reference Sereno suggests.
Thomas R. Holtz, Jr.
Email: firstname.lastname@example.org Phone: 301-405-4084
Office: Centreville 1216
Senior Lecturer, Vertebrate Paleontology
Dept. of Geology, University of Maryland
Faculty Director, Science & Global Change Program, College Park Scholars
Mailing Address: Thomas R. Holtz, Jr.
Department of Geology
Building 237, Room 1117
University of Maryland
College Park, MD 20742 USA