[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Aurorazhdarcho, new azhdarchoid pterosaur from Late Jurassic, Germany
From my cursory look through this paper I have to wonder if this thing
was peer-reviewed at all, but that's all I can really say for now. Not
surprising though, it seems like a lot of recent pterosaur papers were
just sent straight from the author's desk to the printer with nobody
bothering to even read the abstract along the way, and this is certainly
*not* the most egregious example.
On 24/10/11 18:58, David Marjanovic wrote:
If it's a new "Family," there's no way it can be called what it says
in the abstract. Sigh.
Exactly. Google doesn't know a "*Protazhdarcho*". Three possibilities:
-- *Protazhdarcho* is named in the paper, and the contents of the
paper somehow haven't made it to Google yet. In that case it's
surprising it's not mentioned in the abstract.
-- Protazhdarchidae isn't intended to be a family, except, uh, except
the abstract explicitly says it is.
-- Protazhdarchidae is a failure of peer review. A rather surprising