[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Hadrosaurs from China and Russia + K/Pg boundary stuff in Global Geology

From: Ben Creisler

This recent issue of Global Geology apparently has not been mentioned on
the DML yet. It contains a series of articles about the K/Pg boundary in
northern China and Russia near the border region--it includes an article
about hadrosaurs.

Global Geology 2011 (3)

Here's the full ref for the hadrosaur paper (no page numbers or doi for

Pascal Godefroit, Pascaline Lauters, Jimmy Van Itterbeeck, Yuri L. Bolotsky
& Ivan Y. Bolotsky (2011) 
Recent advances on study of hadrosaurid dinosaurs in Heilongjiang (Amur)
River area between China and Russia.
Global Geology 2011 (3):

Four main dinosaur-bearing sites have been investigated in latest
Cretaceous deposits from the Amur/Heilongjiang Region: Jiayin and Wulaga in
China (Yuliangze Formation),Blagoveschensk and Kundur in Russia (Udurchukan
Formation). More than 90% of the bones discovered in these localities
belong to hollowcrested lambeosaurine hadrosaurids: Charonosaurus
jiayinensis at Jiayin, Amurosaurus riabinini at Blagoveschensk, Olorotitan
arharensis at Kundur,and Sahaliyania elunchunorum at Wulaga. Flat-headed
hadrosaurine hadrosaurids are much less numerous,but appear well
diversified as well: Kerberosaurus manakini at Blagoveschensk, Wulagasaurus
dongi at Wulaga,and a new genus at Kundur. Theropods are represented by
shed teeth and isolated bones; isolated scutes and teeth discovered at
Kundur are tentatively attributed to nodosaurids. Palynological studies
suggest that these sites are probably synchronous with the Lancian
vertebrate localities of western North America,which represent the youngest
dinosaur faunas in this area. However,the latest Cretaceous dinosaur
assemblages are completely different in the Amur/Heilongjiang region
(lambeosaurines abundant,ceratopsids absent) and in western North America
(ceratopsids abundant,lambeosaurines extremely rare or absent). This
probably reflects some kind of geographical barrier between both areas by
Maastrichtian time rather than strong differences in palaeoecological

NOTE: I didn't find this paper posted yet on Pascal Godefroit's website:

mail2web.com - Microsoft® Exchange solutions from a leading provider -