[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: 11th specimen of Archaeopteryx
On 10/28/2011 3:03 PM, Jason Brougham wrote:
Dr. Habib, did you write once that mathematical aerodynamic models show a
reduction of performance if there is a gap between the secondaries and the body
Perhaps irrelevant, but -- I once did wing mutilation experiments on
Carpenter Bees (X. virginica) that entailed cooling the bees to
"anesthetize" them, clipping the wing ends incrementally and then
placing them in a pressure-controlled test-chamber to see if they could
Bees w/ literally half a wing could still become briefly airborne -- and
when ambient pressure in the chamber was increased to 2-3 atm, thereby
increasing the density, sustained hovering (~30 seconds) was achieved.
My point, relative to this thread -- I also tried clipping the
secondaries only, which created a gap between wing and body -- these
bees apparently could not generate lift under any density conditions.
The inboard wing is important, at least to these animals.
Also -- domesticated mallard ducks fly well -- it is a traditional
husbandry practice to clip their feathers periodically to keep them
close to home. This offers both a body of practical knowledge, and the
opportunity to experiment...