[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Eufalconimorphae and homoplasy in mol-phyl
Alexander Suh <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> again, I have a few comments - sorry about that. :-)
I, for one, enjoy your comments. :o)
> Looking at the retroposons (in an alignment created from the sequences of
> Hackett et al. 2008), there are the following in beta-fibrinogen intron 7:
> - a shared insertion of a CR1-H-related retroposon in the sampled
> representatives of Columbiformes
Just a question, is that the traditional Columbiformes (Columbidae +
Pteroclidae) or Hackett et al.'s "Columbiformes sensu lato"
(Pteroclidae + (Mesitornithidae + Columbidae))? I am asking because
the position of mesites is one of the few cases where Hackett et al.
(2008) did not support the results of Ericson et al. (whose analysis
recovered a sister group relationship between mesites and
_Mirandornithes_). Perhaps retroposons could help...