[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Dinosaur Revolution Review
No dermal soft tissues of embryos and hatchlings?
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 2:32 PM, Thomas R. Holtz, Jr. <email@example.com> wrote:
>> From: owner-DINOSAUR@usc.edu [mailto:owner-DINOSAUR@usc.edu]
>> On Behalf Of Roberto Takata
>> Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2011 1:21 PM
>> To: firstname.lastname@example.org
>> Subject: Re: Dinosaur Revolution Review
>> How the dinosaur mummified skin and skin impression are
>> distributed on the phylogenetic tree?
> Really, really good skin impressions (mummies) in
> * Ornithopoda (lambeosaurine and saurolophine hadrosaurs)
> * Ceratopsia (ceratopsids, Psittacosaurus)
> Patches of skin known in Thyreophora. Fuzz in the heterodontosaurus
> Patches of skin in some sauropods.
> Unpublished (save for close ups) of skin impressions in the abelisaurid
> Skin impressions for the allosauroid Concavenator.
> Some patches of skin known for tyrannosaurids. Fuzz known in primitive
> coelurosaurs Dilong, Juravenator, various compsoganthids.
> Fuzz, straps, and/or pennaceous feathers known in therizinosaurs,
> alvarezsaurids, oviraptorosaurs, dromaeosaurids, troodontids,
> archaeopterygids, scansoriopterygids, and non-avian avialians. (And, of
> course, in birds).
> Thomas R. Holtz, Jr.
> Email: email@example.com Phone: 301-405-4084
> Office: Centreville 1216
> Senior Lecturer, Vertebrate Paleontology
> Dept. of Geology, University of Maryland
> Fax: 301-314-9661
> Faculty Director, Science & Global Change Program, College Park Scholars
> Fax: 301-314-9843
> Mailing Address: Thomas R. Holtz, Jr.
> Department of Geology
> Building 237, Room 1117
> University of Maryland
> College Park, MD 20742 USA