[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Rconstructing DNA (was Re: Dino-fuzz found in amber?)
Roberto Takata <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> Actually not. It is *eukaryotic* sequences. They share the same
> nuclear genetic code and it is that characteristic that I've used. Or
> more proximally, they are coelurosaurs (which share the same nuclear
> genetic code too). It is not strictly interpolation too.
Again, the point of this exercise completely eludes me. All you're
doing is putting together a DNA consensus sequence for this part of
the alpha-2 collagen gene, based solely on a couple of bird sequences.
Even if you manage get the homologous sequences from more birds or
crocodilians, it still won't tell you what the _T. rex_ DNA sequence
actually was. You'll just get a consensus sequence drawn from a
higher tally of constituent DNA sequences (birds and crocodilians).
Yes, the DNA sequence for _T. rex_ will probably conform to the
consensus sequence - but so what?