[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: Paleocene dinosaur dating controversy in Geology

google is your friend - I googled the title and clicked the PDF link,
which worked fine to open the PDF
Dr. Heinrich Mallison
Abteilung Forschung
Museum für Naturkunde - Leibniz-Institut
für Evolutions- und Biodiversitätsforschung
an der Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
Invalidenstrasse 43
10115 Berlin
Office phone: +49 (0)30 2093 8764
Email: heinrich.mallison@gmail.com
Fere libenter homines id quod volunt credunt.
Gaius Julius Caesar

On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 5:19 PM, David Marjanovic
<david.marjanovic@gmx.at> wrote:
>> The April issue of Geology has an open-access Forum reacting to a
>> paper claiming to date a hadrosaur bone to the Paleocene:
>> Fassett, J.E., Heaman, L.M., & Simonetti, A. (2011)
>> Direct U-Pb dating of Cretaceous and Paleocene dinosaur bones, San
>> Juan Basin, New Mexico.
>> Geology 39: 159–162,
>> doi:10.1130/G31466.1.
>> free pdf:
>> http://geology.gsapubs.org/content/39/2/159.full.pdf+html
>> Comments and reaction to 2011 paper in the Forum section are open access:
>> http://geology.gsapubs.org/content/current
> The forum section is indeed open (and contains several interesting papers), 
> but the original paper is behind a paywall.