[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: Crocodyliformes supertree

GAH, 43 bucks for access. Not available yet through my campus because
of a 1-year embargo. Wonder how this Crocodyliformes morphological
tree compares to Oaks 2011's concatenated, time calibrated gene tree
of Crocodylia.

Actually I see that wikipedia shows a tree it claims comes from that paper:

And it looks like it stops at Neosuchians, so no overlap between the two.

On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 3:59 PM, Ben Creisler <bcreisler@gmail.com> wrote:
> From: Ben Creisler
> bcreisler@gmail.com
> A new online paper:
> Mario Bronzati, Felipe Chinaglia Montefeltro & Max C. Langer (2012)
> A species-level supertree of Crocodyliformes.
> Historical Biology (advance online publication)
> DOI:10.1080/08912963.2012.662680
> http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/08912963.2012.662680
> With fossils found worldwide, Crocodyliformes stands as one of the
> best documented vertebrates over the Mesozoic and Cenozoic. The
> multiple phylogenetic hypotheses of relationship proposed for the
> group allow plenty of space for contentious results, partially due to
> the small overlapping of taxa and disagreeing homology statements
> among studies. We present two supertrees of Crocodyliformes, based on
> different protocols of source tree selection, summarising phylogenetic
> data for the group into a ‘synthetic consensus’. The consensus of the
> most parsimonious trees, containing 184 terminal taxa, has a
> remarkably well-resolved branching structure, which may serve as a
> framework for further macroevolutionary studies. In addition, the
> IterPCR script was for the first time used in the supertree context to
> build a reduced consensus tree with the pruning of unstable taxa.

Robert J. Schenck
Kingsborough Community College
Physical Sciences Department
S332 ph# 718-368-5792
Follow Me on Twitter: @Schenck
KCC Class Schedule on Google Calendar: http://tinyurl.com/mqwlcy