[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

RE: 2012 US presidential race

Please.... can we stop this and go back to paleontology;  there are other forum 
sites for persons to discuss politics.  

Dr. Jane  P. Davidson
Professor of History of Art
University ofNevada, Reno
Reno, NV  USA  89557
fax 775-784-6655
replies to: jdhexen@aol.com  or to jdhexen@unr.edu

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-DINOSAUR@usc.edu [mailto:owner-DINOSAUR@usc.edu] On Behalf Of Scott
Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2012 11:50 AM
To: keenir@hotmail.com; tyazbeck@comcast.net; dinosaur@usc.edu
Subject: Re: 2012 US presidential race

Even the utterly ridiculous, baggage-laden Newt would have to pander to the 
anti-science right of his party ever to get the nomination. Only Jon 
Huntsman (no longer in the race) could ever have made me hold my nose and 
vote for a republican. He at least believed in evolution! And was willing to 
admit that there might be something to climate change...

Obama will win, and thank goodness!

Scott Perry
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Anthony Docimo" <keenir@hotmail.com>
To: <tyazbeck@comcast.net>; <dinosaur@usc.edu>
Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2012 9:29 PM
Subject: RE: 2012 US presidential race

 > Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 00:20:59 +0000
> From: tyazbeck@comcast.net
> To: dinosaur@usc.edu
> Subject: 2012 US presidential race
> I know it's a little late, but...who do you all think is the best US 
> presidential candidate, for scientists President Robert Bakker Vice 
> President Jennifer Clack > (including Obama!)? I personally think Newt 
> gingrich is the best for science BY FAR, and i would say Santorum too, but 
> he dropped out :( I am a conservative Roman Catholic just like him. But 
> I'd be happy with anyone other than Obama, Ron Paul, Vermin Supreme (look 
> him up!)or any obvious saboteurs( i.e. muslim brotherhood, nazi party 
> etc.). I understand most scientists in the USA are Democrats...