[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

RE: Sauropodz r kewl WAS: silly conversation on 2012 US presidential race

You know...if we keep this thread going, we will hear a lot of cool dinosaurs 
named as favorites; (Brachiosaurus, Apatosaurus, Nigersaurus, Rugops, 
Tyrannosaurus, Kosmoceratops, Styracosaurus, Lambeosaurus, Velociraptor, etc, 
etc)....but I'm willing to bet there is one dinosaur name that doesn't get 
thrown out there....Thescelosaurus.  

Hmmm?   Any takers?  Anyone at all?


-----Original Message-----
From: owner-DINOSAUR@usc.edu [mailto:owner-DINOSAUR@usc.edu] On Behalf Of Scott 
Sent: Friday, April 13, 2012 10:19 AM
To: Dino List
Subject: Re: Sauropodz r kewl WAS: silly conversation on 2012 US presidential 

I think you're all wrong; basal saurischians (especially
"prosauropods") are the bee's knees.


On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 10:17 AM, Michael OSullivan 
<Michael.OSullivan@port.ac.uk> wrote:
> sorry kids, Ceratopsians are frankly so awesome it's not even funny
> ---
> Michael O'Sullivan
> Palaeobiology Research Group
> Postgraduate Student
> School of Earth & Environmental Sciences Burnaby Building Burnaby Road 
> Portsmouth
> PO1 3QL
> Email:michael.osullivan@port.ac.uk
>>>> "Mark Witton"  13/04/12 3:28 PM >>>
> Mike,
> If I wasn't working on pterosaurs, I reckon sauropods would be my 
> preferred research subject. Other dinosaurs are interesting and all, 
> but sauropods definitely have an X factor that the others don't. Maybe 
> it's because they seem to be incredibly unlikely beasts. The general 
> bauplans of other dinosaurs seem less out of place compared to our modern 
> fauna.
> The megatheropods are really just big birds, ornithischians are 
> reptilian variants of modern livestock, but sauropods can't be neatly 
> shoehorned into any modern context. Oh, and they're massive. Come on, 
> admit it: we're all impressed with Big Things.
> Has there ever been a discussion of 'my favourite dinosaur' on here?
> It's _the_ dinosaur question most kids are interested in, but we seem 
> to slip away from it towards adulthood. I'll bet every osteologically 
> mature palaeontologist still has a favourite, though.
> Mark
> --
> Dr. Mark Witton
> www.markwitton.com
> Lecturer
> Palaeobiology Research Group
> School of Earth and Environmental Sciences University of Portsmouth 
> Burnaby Building Burnaby Road Portsmouth
> PO1 3QL
> Tel: (44)2392 842418
> E-mail: Mark.Witton@port.ac.uk
> If pterosaurs are your thing, be sure to pop by:
> - Pterosaur.Net: www.pterosaur.net
> - The Pterosaur.Net blog: http://pterosaur-net.blogspot.com/
> - My pterosaur artwork: www.flickr.com/photos/markwitton
>>>> Mike Taylor  4/13/2012 2:05 PM >>>
> On 13 April 2012 13:49, Thomas R. Holtz, Jr.  wrote:
>>> From: owner-DINOSAUR@usc.edu [mailto:owner-DINOSAUR@usc.edu] On 
>>> Behalf Of Mark Witton
>>> I like sauropods, too. I always thought Dicraeosaurus was the mutt's 
>>> nuts.
>> I'm an old-fashioned guy in this context: I'm an Apatosaurus fan.
> I have to say it warms my heart to see Scott going with Brachiosaurus, 
> Mark with Dicraeosaurus and now Tom with Apatosaurus.  Truly, three of 
> the most outrageous and beautiful creatures ever to have walked the 
> Earth.  Not just because they're sauropods: but THOSE sauropods in 
> particular.  Only Xenoposeidon and Bronotmerus are more lovely.
>>> Seconding Scott's point (and those of several others). This isn't a 
>>> forum for discussing politics, so this thread really should be put 
>>> to bed.
>> Indeed!
>> In fact, I hear tell that there are places on the Internet where
> people can actually discuss politics all the time. Maybe instead of
>> infesting a forum on dinosaurs, the indvidual involved might take it
> over to one of those...
> I can only assume that Mickey and Mary are on holiday.  Come back, 
> M&M!  We need you!
> -- Mike.

Scott Hartman
Scientific Advisor/Technical Illustrator
(307) 921-9750
(608) 620-4030
website: www.skeletaldrawing.com
blog: http://skeletaldrawing.blogspot.com/