[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Sauropodz r kewl WAS: silly conversation on 2012 US presidential race
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 3:23 PM, Anthony Docimo <email@example.com> wrote:
>> Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 08:56:12 -0700
>> From: firstname.lastname@example.org
>> To: email@example.com
>> Subject: Re: Sauropodz r kewl WAS: silly conversation on 2012 US
>> presidential race
>> On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 8:01 AM, Anthony Docimo <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>> > We've demolished groups such as Pachyderma, relocating its members
>> > (rhinos, elephants, etc) to their true relatives...and yet the tuatara,
>> > aardvark and pangolin are set aside in their own groups with no near
>> > extant relatives.
>> > so, if there is no way to quantify it, why do we keep them separate?
>> But they aren't "separate". Sphenodon* is in Lepidosauria, along with
>> its extant sister group, Squamata.
> But Sphenodon gets a number of (ranks?) above Genus to itself
It does? Last I checked there are dozens of non-Spenodon sphenodntids
and non-sphenodontid sphenodontians. They just happen to all be