[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: T.rex casting rights issue settled... or not -news!

Don't get me started about what I heard about a TV things, where they
supposedly made INTENTIONAL mistakes so there would be no copyright
issues, as the errors were easy to copyright.
Dr. Heinrich Mallison
Abteilung Forschung
Museum für Naturkunde - Leibniz-Institut
für Evolutions- und Biodiversitätsforschung
an der Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
Invalidenstrasse 43
10115 Berlin
Office phone: +49 (0)30 2093 8764
Email: heinrich.mallison@gmail.com
Fere libenter homines id quod volunt credunt.
Gaius Julius Caesar

On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 12:53 PM, Mike Taylor <mike@indexdata.com> wrote:
> On 19 April 2012 11:40, David Marjanovic <david.marjanovic@gmx.at> wrote:
>> Am 18.04.2012 15:23, schrieb Robert Schenck:
>>>  Haven't heard about this case before. Sounds like an interesting
>>>  case. I'll venture to say [...] that a casting could be considered
>>>  protected intellectual property. Two companies could both attempt to
>>>  make castings of an original specimen, and they could both end up
>>>  pretty different. There's technique and intellectual artistry
>>>  applied, so it seems like they could be considered as such.
>> That said, the better the casts are, the more similar will they be to each> 
>> other. Ideally, they'll be indistinguishable (if they're not dyed
>> differently or whatever).
> Right.  The only part that would rationally be subject to copyright
> would be the mistakes.
> -- Mike.