[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Body size terminology
Brachiosauridae is a large-bodied clade, but not a large clade.
On 30 July 2012 01:20, David Marjanovic <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> Brad McFeeters wrote, truncatedly:
>> In some recent papers I have seen dinosaurs described as
>> "small-bodied" or "large-bodied" instead of simply "small" or
>> "large." Does this actually clarify anything?
> In rare circumstances, it means that "small" and "large" are meant literally
> rather than in some metaphorical way. A small clade, for instance, would
> probably be one with low diversity, not necessarily a small-bodied clade.
> But usually there's no point, it's just a habit.