[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: Having your ideas published without attribution, and having your names with priority ignored

I tried to publish this on your blog, but you've disallowed 
anonymous comments and comments with simply a name. I don't 
have a Google, Livejournal, Wordpress, AIM, or OpenID i can 
or want to use, so I'll post it here instead:

I agree w/ your statement [in your blog] that blog posts mean 
zilch. Synonymy (or whatever) may very well have been your 
idea, but then you should have gone through the hassle of 
publishing that conclusion in a journal. The difference 
between journals and blogs is that blogs can disappear at 
any time. Hence, they can't really be used as references or 
sources, although it's possible that some people do go around 
mining them for ideas. I personally ignore virtually all blogs 
all the time, though i occasionally encounter one as i have 
here. More importantly, blogs *aren't* referenced; hence, one 
tends not to come across them while researching a particular 
topic, e.g. systematics of whatever.

In any event, it's not unusual for different researchers 
working independently to reach the same conclusions. 

    Paul P.

--- On Wed, 8/29/12, Mickey Mortimer <mickey_mortimer111@msn.com> wrote:

> From: Mickey Mortimer <mickey_mortimer111@msn.com>
> Subject: Having your ideas published without attribution, and having your 
> names with priority ignored
> To: "dinosaur@usc.edu" <dinosaur@usc.edu>
> Date: Wednesday, August 29, 2012, 8:47 PM
> So, Gao et al. have a paper out in the new JVP issue with
> the major conclusion "Examination of the characters used to
> diagnose other named sapeornithid species reveals that such
> diagnoses have incorporated morphologies that are influenced
> by either taphonomy or ontogeny. Based on qualitative and
> quantitative comparisons between the new specimen and other
> sapeornithid species, we argue that all other named
> sapeornithids are junior synonyms of S. chaoyangensis." 
> Does that sound familiar to anyone?  Moreover they are the
> latest and one the most egregious examples of workers
> utterly ignoring Omnivoropteryx and Omnivoroptery
ur years priority over
> Sapeornithidae.  More here- 
> http://theropoddatabase.blogspot.com/2012/08/having-your-ideas-published-without.html
> .  Thoughts?
> Mickey Mortimer