[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Gryphoceratops published? (was RE: Vitakridrinda publication validity)
On Sat, February 25, 2012 12:32 am, Brad McFeeters wrote:
> According to one of the authors, the version with "Gryphognathus" wasn't
> intended to be the final draft, despite being leaked by the journal.
> And is the print version of the "June" issue of Cretaceous Research
> seriously out already?! It's still February!
> If the June 2012 issue containing *Gryphoceratops* is has indeed been
> printed in February 2012, but someone later publishes a synonym of it in a
> journal dated May 2012, how would anyone prove the priority of
> *Gryphoceratops*? Has a taxon ever been unfairly sunk because the journal
> was dated incorrectly?
For purposes of dating, there is almost always a published date (day,
month, year) on a page with other copyright and publishing information on
the printed journal. It is that date--not anything on the cover as
such--which holds for determining the date of publication.
Thomas R. Holtz, Jr.
Email: firstname.lastname@example.org Phone: 301-405-4084
Office: Centreville 1216
Senior Lecturer, Vertebrate Paleontology
Dept. of Geology, University of Maryland
Faculty Director, Science & Global Change Program, College Park Scholars
Mailing Address: Thomas R. Holtz, Jr.
Department of Geology
Building 237, Room 1117
University of Maryland
College Park, MD 20742 USA