[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

RE: Vitakridrinda publication validity

> and this is true also of the Wikipedia
> page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ambondro_mahabo . The context of this
> nomenclature isn't even mentioned in the page itself, which is -- I
> feel -- idiotic, not to mention disingenuous of further revisors of the
> page who HAVE read the paper.

It is immoral to complain about Wikipedia. Go and fix it yourself. Just click 
on "Edit". :-)