[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Huge morphological analysis reconfirms deep branch relationships among Squamates.
> > Conrad tried to test this by deleting all taxa
> except limbless
> > burrowers (snakes are basally burrowing in his
> analysis, and notably
> > the burrowing Sineoamphisbaena is sister to
> Anniella+Krypteia in
> > Gauthier et al.'s), and claimed because Krypteia
> still emerged,
> > limbless burrowing characters weren't
> How about looking for correlated _characters_ instead and --
> not removing, but merging them?
> (I speak from experience when I say characters correlated to
> others shouldn't simply be removed. In fact, I'll publish on
> that. Short version: comparing characters is a great way to
> find mistakes in the coding of all of them.)
Good to know. Guess I'll look over the Livezey/Zusi Aves appendicular data in
that regard. If I find something, I'll let you know.