[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Velociraptor scavenged azhdarchid pterosaur
On Mar 6, 2012, at 6:01 PM, David Marjanovic wrote:
>> Further, if the purpose of the
>> feathers was not aerodynamic, then it wouldn't matter if they were
>> damaged, or even yanked out completely by struggling prey.
> And if their function _was_ aerodynamic, it still wouldn't matter much.
> Moulting doesn't confine birds to the ground, except those birds that moult
> all wing feathers at once. Highly specialised fliers like swifts only moult a
> pair of wing feathers at once, one on each wing, but that's evidently
> Pretty much any aerodynamic function that *Velociraptor* could have used
> would have been more error-tolerant than any kind of flight.
Fun anecdote to make the point: even with the primaries clipped, large birds
can manage to clear fences with a good gust. When I worked at the Baltimore
Zoo, a Kori Bustard cleared a 6 foot fence during a gusty rainstorm, despite
having his primaries clipped on both sides (note: we're talking about a darn
big bird here, too - I think he was 12 or 13 kg). This is why most zoos now
clip only one wing (the asymmetry produces roll, which makes it more difficult
to clear obstacles).
Assistant Professor of Biology
Woodland Road, Pittsburgh PA 15232
Buhl Hall, Room 226A