[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
RE: Microraptor hanqingi, new species from China.
> Date: Tue, 22 May 2012 09:46:46 -0400
> From: firstname.lastname@example.org
> To: email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org
> Subject: RE: Microraptor hanqingi, new species from China.
> > From: owner-DINOSAUR@usc.edu [mailto:owner-DINOSAUR@usc.edu]
> > On Behalf Of Tim Williams
> > BTW, the dinosaur classification in the "The Princeton Field
> > Guide to Dinosaurs" drove me absolutely nuts, especially the
> > rampant lumping.
> Something worth pointing out here:
> * Paleontologists who work in other taxa (especially in non-vertebrates)
> consider pretty much all dinosaur paleontologists as crazy
> splitters. In some cases, Greg's lumping is more in line with standard
> taxonomic practice for other paleotaxa than is the standards
> of the community. (Basically, most of the taxa at "subfamily" or "tribe"
> levels in dinosaur paleo [or at least those with -inae and
> and -ini endings] would wind up as genera in other disciplines).
Do taxonomists in these other specialties care if genera are paraphyletic?
That's the usual justification I see whenever someone splits a dinosaur genus.