[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Microraptor hanqingi, new species from China.
Am 28.05.2012 05:00, schrieb Tim Williams:
GSPaul <GSP1954@aol.com> wrote:
> [...] Can't discuss this openly because some journals won't then
> consider the paper.
And indeed, he didn't send that message to the list (or at least I never
got it). Tim, be ashamed, you made the mistake I just made four hours
earlier. List administrators, please consider deleting Tim's post.
However, now that I've seen what's going on, I find my mind entirely
unblown, because I must immediately ask (as Tim did) if there's a clear
way to distinguish branch-grasping from prey-grasping adaptations. How
important is branch-grasping to secretarybirds and, I suppose, seriemas?
Do they just occasionally do it because they can, or do they use it to
enhance their reproductive success one way or another? -- Wikipedia says
secretarybirds nest "at a height of 5 -- 7 m" "in *Acacia* trees", so
that answers that question for one of them; *Cariama cristata* nests "on
the ground or in a bush or tree up to 3 m above the ground"; *Chunga
burmeisteri* has a very short article that doesn't mention nesting. So,
there may not be a bird today that uses its feet to grasp prey but not
branches, which would leave you without anything to test your hypothesis
Where do phorusrhacids plot?
Anthony Docimo <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> [...] So perhaps the question should be, of those pigeons, which
> are in the same morphospace as *A. lithographica*? (and the same
> for the birds of prey, trogons, galliforms)
No, I don't think it makes a difference. The differences in
locomotory styles (hip-based vs knee-based) means that using
hindlimb proportions to compare _Archaeopteryx_ to *any* modern avian
has profound limitations.