[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Coronosaurus, new ceratopsid genus for Centrosaurus brinkmani
David Marjanovic <email@example.com> wrote:
>> Coronosaurus is of course a member of Coronosauria (Sereno 1986). Is
>> this = the first time in dinosaur nomenclature that the genus was
>> named after the = similarly-named higher taxon?
> I think so. Outside it, of course, there's *Archosaurus*, apparently named
> for being the oldest known archosaur sensu lato.
Yes, _Archosaurus_ is now considered a basal archosauriform, but not
an archosaur (sensu stricto). Nesbitt (2011) recovered it as a
Outside of Archosauria (way outside), another example of a genus named
after a similar-named higher taxon is the fossil prototherian
_Monotrematum_, originally assigned to the Monotremata.
_Monotrematum_ is now often considered a junior synonym of
_Obdurodon_. But if Monotremata is limited to the crown clade
(_Ornithorhynchus anatinus_+_Tachyglossus aculeatus_), and
_Obdurodon_/_Monotrematum_ lies outside of this clade (as some
phylogenies have proposed), then the genus _Monotrematum_ would not
belong in Monotremata.