[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

RE: Microraptor also ate fish

"the relatively short spoilage time of fish carrion" doesn't seem to put 
seagulls, crows, eagles, or brown bears off too badly.

But I have often wondered why Microraptor remains are so abundant in lake 
sediments. Of all the behavioral scenarios suggested for Microraptor, and with 
all the encumbrance it is supposed to face from the leg feathers, the aquatic 
ones have always seemed the most difficult to envision.
From: owner-DINOSAUR@usc.edu [owner-DINOSAUR@usc.edu] on behalf of David 
Marjanovic [david.marjanovic@gmx.at]
Sent: Saturday, April 20, 2013 6:54 AM
Subject: Re: Microraptor also ate fish

> First, thanks to Xing for  making this freely available.

For those who got the truncated version and didn't see where it's available:

> Thanks Ben, You can download  this paper from: My homepage:
 > http://www.xinglida.net
 > [...]
 > -- Best! yours Lida XING Biological Sciences, University of Alberta,
 > Canada

Anyway, there's snippage in the following paragraph:

> Take the short spoilage time as  the one piece of non-anatomical
 > evidence given.  Is it really shorter than tetrapods?  I had a
 > cabezon carcass sitting behind my shed that took much longer to rot
 > than any comparably sized opossum.  It ended up just drying with the
 > bones articulated and skin stetched over it.  I would think if
 > anything, the constant influx of salt and/or maggot-drowning water
 > would lead to a longer shelf life for carcasses washed ashore. ch is
 > much easier to search than most habitats due to everything being in
 > a... well... line and the lack of vegetation.  Thus carcasses on the
 > shore could be more likely to be eaten by terrestrial predators than
 > those in other environments.