[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: flock, schlock - was poor Einiosaurus

I believe that "flock" tends to convey a sense of volancy and or smallness, and 
is less than apt for nonvolant dinos, especially carnivorous ones -- maybe 
swarm, band, troop, or pride would be better than pack, which indeed has 
overtones of cooperative behavior.

That said, my ear finds "herd" to be entirely acceptable for large herbivores...

On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 2:01 PM EST Andreas Johansson wrote:

>"Pack" has been used for groups of deinonychosaurians, perhaps
>inviting unwarranted lupine analogies.
>On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 7:31 PM, Hammer <hammeris1@att.net> wrote:
>> YES - Einiosaurus mixing or staying close to other ceratopsians whose horns 
>> were better suited for defense, or other genera of dinos that could provide 
>> some 'cover.'  If the word that is causing trouble is "herds," well, from 
>> what I see most of the literature uses herds for the big (probably scaly) 
>> sauropods, ceratopsians, duck-bills, etc.   "Flock" is used for those closer 
>> to birds - the raptors and so forth.  What's the vote on the large theropod 
>> predators? Somehow a "flock" of Daspletosaurs just doesn't sound right after 
>> its use in the English language for the pretty birdies all this time!  A 
>> stronger term is demanded for these impressive/fearsome carnivores, IMHO.
>> ________________________________
>> From: Michael Miller
>> You used the phrase "inter species herding" behavior in your original email. 
>>  I expect that is what he is responding to, not really what your question 
>> was about though.
>> Michael
>Andreas Johansson
>Why can't you be a non-conformist just like everybody else?