[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
RE: Yet more on dinosaur quad climbers
> Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2013 21:42:08 -0400
> From: firstname.lastname@example.org
> To: email@example.com
> CC: firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com
> Subject: Re: Yet more on dinosaur quad climbers
> On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 05:45:43PM -0700, Mike Habib wrote:
>> On Jul 12, 2013, at 5:05 PM, Ruben Safir <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>>> You didn't write this?
>>> "but this does not mean that those effects were the primary function or
>>> that the limbs were used for a sustained flight function (or, indeed, a
>>> lift dominated function at all - though it is likely they were)"
>>> That flight feathers would have evolved for anything other than flight
>>> would be an extradonary hypothesis that would need extradonary evidence.
>> However, the precursor feathers might have, instead, attained some of the
>> relevant morphology under other forms of selection - for example, in the
>> context of display, brooding, armor, etc. Whether or not this is
>> "extraordinary" is a matter of opinion. What is not a matter of opinion,
> Not if you had kites attached to your arms.
If you had a generation with normal arms, and some individuals in the next
generation with kites attached to their arms, I think the term for what
happened is "Hopeful Monster", not gradual selection (pressure).