[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Arboreal Theropods: The prize at the bottom of the cracker jack box
!>From an ecomorphological
>perspective, one pitfall (as Mike Habib and myself pointed out) it is
>very difficult to delineate "partially arboreal" (i.e., only
>occasionally venturing into trees) from "fully arboreal" based on
As I pointed out long ago, beyond the basic ability to climb, it is impossible
to delineate -- even in the case where the "venturing" is nightly.
M gallopavo a good example of ground-foraging animal that perches nightly, yet
has a foot that gives no evidence of that habit -- assuming it is descended
from a smaller pheasant-like ancestor.
>So unless one has a compelling reason to put
>non-avialan theropods in trees, why do it?
As Orenstein mentioned -- PREDATOR AVOIDANCE.