[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
RE: Dinosaur tail traces.review
I always assumed that this was a shift in posture ..
slowing down .. sniffing the air for odours by positioning
the nostrils higher. This would neccesitate a slowing of
forward momentum as well. The abstract sort of suggests that
the animals were still moving forward.
You know .. I've seen this in the Peace River canyons in B.C.
The animals weren't stopping. They were big ornithopods [Gething
Form. .. Aptian times].
There was one apparently [? stalking] if you want to call it
that [metatarsals were clearly visible] but it was still moving
forward with no trace of tail drag.
I'm willing to bet that we're looking at a radical change in
posture. Unfortunately .. don't have a clue how you could test
If anybody's got the paper ..
> Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2013 14:41:09 +1000
> From: firstname.lastname@example.org
> To: email@example.com
> Subject: RE: Dinosaur tail traces.review
> On Wed, Sep 4th, 2013 at 1:26 PM, dale mcinnes <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>> I'm intriqued by that last line [haven't seen the paper yet]..
>> (TDI's) "as a reflection of behavior".
>> Would this possibly be referring to a more upright stance for
>> bipedal dinosaurs ?? Just asking ...
> I could imagine that a horizontal biped trying to move in a crouched stance
> (either stalking prey, or
> keeping low to avoid *being* prey) might have had to occasionally resort to
> contacting the ground
> with the tail to maintain stability. A bit like an outrigger on a canoe
> Dann Pigdon
> Spatial Data Analyst Australian Dinosaurs
> Melbourne, Australia http://home.alphalink.com.au/~dannj