[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
RE: Amphicoelias fragillimus (gigantic sauropod) size overestimated? (free pdf)
On Tue, Dec 16th, 2014 at 12:04 PM, Mickey Mortimer
> The irony here is too delicious to not comment on. Woodruff and Foster
> propose Amphicoelias
> fragillimus wasn't so huge, and that the reported neural arch height of 1500
> mm in Cope's
> measurement table was a typo for 1050 mm. Yet their own measurement table
> using both sizes has a typo itself! "Cop?s arch reconstruction" Good ol'
> Edward Drinker Cop.
> Hilarious. Not a bad theory though.
Muphry's Law at work:
Spatial Data Analyst Australian Dinosaurs
Melbourne, Australia http://home.alphalink.com.au/~dannj