[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Kulindapteryx and Daurosaurus, new hypsilophodont ornithopods from Upper Jurassic of Siberia, Russia
Just to clarify, I understood *ustanovleno* (established) was a
participle in neuter form, functioning like an adjective and modifying
the neuter noun *nalichie* (presence). I don't think I indicated
*ustanovleno* was a noun too--only that it had a neuter nominative
ending "o" to match *nalichie*. I guess I could have said it was a
"passive particle in neuter form" ..... The literal English
translation underneath made the participle role clear.
Anyway, thanks for the input.
On Fri, Jul 4, 2014 at 5:22 PM, David Černý <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> Ben Creisler <email@example.com> wrote:
>> I thought I had misread the grammar in the new article abstract since
>> it sounded odd to say that dermal scales were divided into bristles.
> It does sound odd, but interestingly, it would be quite close to what
> is sometimes seen in modern birds. According to Thulborn (1984: 144),
> Rawles (1960) illustrated "the foot of an 8-week-old fowl, with
> completed down feathers emerging from the edges of its scales".
> Of course, the formal English translation of the paper (or even access
> to the full text of the Russian version) would help immensely.
>> Dlya gipsilofodontii [genitive plural?] ustanovleno [neuter] nalichie
>> [nominative neuter noun] razdelennykh [genitive plural] na
>> “shchetinki” [accusative plural] kozhnykh cheshui [genitive plural].
> "Ustanovleno" is a passive participle of the verb ustanovit' (to
> establish), just as in your English translation, not a neuter noun.
> Aside from that, your analysis is entirely correct.
> Rawles ME 1960 The integumentary system. 189--240 _in_ Marshall AJ,
> ed. _Biology and Comparative Physiology of Birds_. London: Acad Press
> Thulborn RA 1984 The avian relationships of _Archaeopteryx_, and the
> origin of birds. Zool J Linn Soc 82: 119--58
> David Černý