[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
RE: Stegosaurus sexually dimorphic dermal plates
> From: owner-DINOSAUR@usc.edu [mailto:owner-DINOSAUR@usc.edu] On Behalf Of
> Paul P
> This seems to be, at least in part, an issue of quantity vs. quality.
> The old way was for the author, and to some degree the editor, to distill a
> project into a nice, tight little paper (in-house
> notwithstanding). Now apparently it's the reader's job to take all the parts
> (S1 text, figures, tables, etc.), decide what's
> then piece that together into something readable.
> Is it just me, or do others too have difficulty reading a paper that
> constantly references figures that aren't present?
While it's understandable that the "extended abstract" journals (Nature,
Science, PNAS) need to put a lot of stuff in supplementals,
an online journal like PLoS doesn't need to do that as much. There aren't "page
charges" as such, so I agree: any figure or table or
text referenced more than once should probably be in the paper itself.
Thomas R. Holtz, Jr.
Email: firstname.lastname@example.org Phone: 301-405-4084
Office: Centreville 1216
Senior Lecturer, Vertebrate Paleontology
Dept. of Geology, University of Maryland
Faculty Director, Science & Global Change Program, College Park Scholars
Mailing Address: Thomas R. Holtz, Jr.
Department of Geology
Building 237, Room 1117
University of Maryland
College Park, MD 20742 USA