[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: [dinosaur] Dawndraco kanzai reassigned to Pteranodon sternbergi (free pdf)

Two follow open access responses:

Alexander Kellner (2017)
Rebuttal of Martin-Silverstone et al. 2017, ‘Reassessment of Dawndraco kanzai Kellner 2010 and reassignment of the type specimen to Pteranodon sternbergi Harksen, 1966’
Vertebrate Anatomy Morphology Palaeontology 3:81–89
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18435/B54D49

John H. Acorn, Elizabeth Martin-Silverstone, James R.N. Glasier, Sydney Mohr & Philip J. Currie (2017)
Response to Kellner (2017) 'Rebuttal of Martin-Silverstone, E., J.R.N. Glasier, J.H. Acorn, S. Mohr, and P.J. Currie, 2017'
Vertebrate Anatomy Morphology Palaeontology 3:90–92
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18435/B50M2C

Virus-free. www.avg.com

On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 4:06 PM, Ben Creisler <bcreisler@gmail.com> wrote:

Ben Creisler

A new paper in open access:

Elizabeth Martin-Silverstone, James R.N. Glasier, John H. Acorn, Sydney Mohr, and Philip J. Currie (2017)
Reassessment of Dawndraco kanzai Kellner, 2010 and reassignment of the type specimen to Pteranodon sternbergi Harksen, 1966.
Vertebrate Anatomy Morphology Palaeontology 3:47-59

The previous most comprehensive study on Pteranodon recognized two species of Pteranodon: P. longiceps and P. sternbergi. Complete skeletons of Pteranodon are rare, and one of the best preserved (UALVP 24238) has been identified as both P. sternbergi, and as a new genus and species, Dawndraco kanzai.  Here, the specimen is redescribed, the rostral apex is identified for the first time, new details of its provenance and preparation history are presented, and its taxonomic placement is discussed.  Whereas the shape of the rostrum appears at first glance to distinguish it from known Pteranodon, this feature is more parsimoniously interpreted in the context of sexual dimorphism; males have a longer and therefore more shallowly tapering rostrum.  Metrics from this specimen, and from published photographs and illustrations, support the conclusion that the rostrum of UALVP 24238 is neither unique, nor grounds for recognition of a taxon distinct from Pteranodon sternbergi.  Other putatively unique features of UALVP 24238 are examined and found unconvincing.