[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

[dinosaur] Aracoaraichnium, new ichnogenus of large mammaliform tracks from Lower Cretaceous of Brazil (free pdf)




Ben Creisler
bcreisler@gmail.com

A new paper with a free pdf:




Pedro Victor Buck, Aline Marcele Ghilardi, Luciana Bueno dos Reis Fernandes & Marcelo Adorna Fernandes (2017)
A new ichnotaxon classification of large mammaliform trackways from the Lower Cretaceous Botucatu Formation, Paraná Basin, Brazil.
Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology (advance online publication)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.palaeo.2017.06.027
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0031018216309312



Highlights



Is described a new tetrapod ichnotaxon, Aracoaraichnium leonardii igen. nov. isp. nov.
The tracks of this ichnotaxon have a mammaliform affinity.
They differ from Brasilichnium in morphological and locomotorial aspects.
Smaller footprints here described are interpreted in function of subsurface production.
The producer probably lived near the Botucatu paleodesert, and made some incursions on that habitat.




Abstract


During the Early Cretaceous, a large area in Brazil and other South American countries was covered by an extensive paleoerg field, the Botucatu Desert. The Araraquara County (São Paulo State, Brazil) contains some of the most diverse ichnological assemblages in the Botucatu Formation. Mammaliform trace fossils from the Botucatu Formation are of great interest, as they may represent the only record of Lower Cretaceous Mammaliamorpha from Brazil. These trace fossils can be grouped into two distinct classes, based on the dimensions of the footprints. The larger morphotype is described and classified as a new ichnotaxon, Aracoaraichnium leonardii igen. nov. isp. nov., with a discussion of preservational features and paleoecological aspects. This morphotype can be differentiated from Brasilichnium Leonardi, 1981 by digit morphology, with digits III and IV being larger and sub-equal in size. The tracks are mesaxonic, unlike Brasilichnium, which is ectaxonic, and the stride is proportionally smaller, suggesting a trackmaker with shorter limbs in relation to body length. Another characteristic that reinforces the new ichnotaxon is the larger size of the footprints of Aracoaraichnium igen. nov. Footprints representing intermediate ontogenetic stages between Brasilichnium and the larger morphotype are not observed, suggesting that the two track types were made by different taxa. Compared with others tetrapod ichnotaxa, the new ichnotaxon is characterized by differences in the number and morphology of the digits, track morphology, the degree of heteropody, and locomotor parameters. Tracks with good preservation quality were likely originally produced in the humid subsurface, below the surficial dry sand layer. Tracks with smaller dimensions, and trackways with the presence or absence of the manus, may be due to variable degrees of impression into subsurface layers, and substrate heterogeneity. The Aracoaraichnium igen. nov. trackmakers probably inhabited areas near the desert, making occasional incursions into desert areas, while Brasilichnium trackmakers may have been mostly nocturnal residents of the desert environment.